You are here: Home Green For All Blog Green For All testifies before Congress: Green the Stimulus and create a Clean Energy Corps

Green For All testifies before Congress: Green the Stimulus and create a Clean Energy Corps

Posted by Ada McMahon at Jan 15, 2009 10:40 AM |

Today, Green For All's President Van Jones is testifying before Congress at a hearing on green jobs and the economic stimulus. Read his testimony here. At the hearing, Jones will dispel several myths about green jobs, and urge Congress to "move aggressively from inspiration to implementation" - starting with fully funding the Green Jobs Act.

Today, Green For All's President Van Jones is testifying before Congress at a hearing on green jobs and the economic stimulus.

____________________

1/16 Update: Watch the video


1/16 Update: The testimony Jones delivered was quite different from his written remarks.  The Wonk Room has posted the transcript of his testimony.

____________________

Read his written testimony here.

At the hearing, Jones will dispel several myths about green jobs, and urge Congress to "move aggressively from inspiration to implementation" - starting with fully funding the Green Jobs Act.

About the Hearing
The hearing is held by the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, chaired by climate champion Rep. Ed Markey.

According to the Select Committee's press release:

"...the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming will devote its first hearing of the 111th Congress to creating jobs and stimulating our economy through renewable energy and efficiency programs. The economic stimulus package being worked on by Congress and President-elect Barack Obama presents an opportunity for America to take a step forward by investing in renewable technology and infrastructure that will put people to work while transitioning our nation to a clean energy economy."

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, and others, will be on the panel as well.

Read the press release.

Take Action

act now button
 
Join Green For All in telling Congress to Green the Stimulus. More than 11,000 people have already sent letters to their representatives.

If you've already taken action, please share this link with your friends: http://org2.democracyinaction.org/o/5379/t/2457/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=842

____________________


Testimony before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming

Van Jones, J.D.
President, Green For All
Oakland, California
 
Thursday, January 15, 2009
 

Opportunities For Green Growth: Myths & Realities About Green Jobs

 
Chairman Markey and members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me here today.

I am here representing Green For All, a national organization dedicated to helping to build an inclusive, green economy – strong enough to lift millions of people out of poverty.

I first testified before this esteemed committee in May 2007. At that time, the term “green collar job” only rarely had been heard in the halls of Congress. The term had seldom – if ever – appeared in the mainstream political press.

Today the concept is everywhere. The term resonates because it speaks to a deep and abiding hunger in our society for big, practical answers to big, tough challenges. Citizens and community members everywhere are seeking smart solutions to our two biggest problems – the economic downturn and the ecological collapse.

The nation is finally realizing that the solutions to these twin crises are linked. That is because nearly everything that is good for the environment – and practically everything that is good in the fight against global warming – is a job.

Solar panels don’t install themselves. Wind turbines don’t manufacture themselves. Homes and buildings don’t retrofit or weatherize themselves. In our industrial society, trees don’t even PLANT themselves, anymore. Real people must do all of that work.

To be successful, American workers need some new tools, some new training and access to some new technology. They also need a policy environment that supports employers who are trying to bring low-carbon prosperity to our country. With those things in place, we can begin to put some green rungs on America’s ladder of opportunity.

If we are smart, we will make the invention, manufacturing and deploying of clean energy technology a cornerstone of the next American economy – and create green pathways out of poverty, while we do it.

The realization that we can simultaneously restore the Earth and revive our economy has inspired millions. Increasingly, federal, state and local elected officials, labor and business leaders, social justice champions, environmentalists and youth see great economic opportunities in advancing green solutions to our climate and energy crises.

And yet confusion reigns. Every day, someone asks me: “Oh, yes, we are very excited about all you are doing. But what exactly IS a green job?”
Also, some vocal opponents and naysayers have begun spreading falsehoods and confusion about what is in fact a very simple and practical concept. It must be said that even proponents of the idea have missed important opportunities to move the green jobs concept from rhetoric to reality. So we are all still finding our way in this journey toward a clean and green economy.

I want to address a few of those issues here. First of all, what is a “green collar job”? The simplest definition is that it is a traditional, family-supporting, blue collar job – that has been upgraded and upskilled to better respect the environment. In other words, we are not talking about anything revolutionary. We are not talking Buck Rogers jobs, or science fiction jobs, or George Jetson jobs. These are very familiar jobs in familiar trades – roofers, metal workers, electricians, carpenters, etc. But they have been repurposed and up-skilled to meet the challenges of a carbon-constrained era.

Congress already spelled out critical skill-building supports and specific, eligible industries in the Green Jobs Act which passed into law as part of comprehensive energy legislation in December 2007 (P.L. 110-140):

(1) energy-efficient building, construction, and retrofits industries; (construction)

(2) renewable electric power industry; (energy)

(3) energy efficient and advanced drive train vehicle industry; (transportation)

(4) biofuels industry; (energy)

(5) deconstruction and materials use industries; (recycling)

(6) energy efficiency assessment industry serving the residential, commercial, or industrial sectors; and (construction/energy)

(7) manufacturers that produce sustainable products using environmentally sustainable processes and materials (manufacturing).

Therefore, it is not true that these green jobs are strictly a term of art or a piece of political rhetoric, impossible to meaningfully define or precisely categorize. Also, it is not true that these are just hypothetical jobs or mythical jobs.

But while we are on the topic of mythology, let me address three actual myths about green jobs.


The first is that smart support for renewable energy and energy efficiency will not create a NET increase in jobs. The popular “zero sum” critique is that every green job actually will just represent the loss of a gray job, somewhere. In this view, it is impossible for a green economy to actually increase the total number of jobs in the United States.


Thankfully, the Green Recovery report (commissioned by PERI and the Center for American Progress) thoroughly debunked this myth last year. That landmark study shows that the same amount of money invested in energy efficiency and renewable energy actually creates FOUR TIMES as many jobs as the same money invested in the oil industry.


It turns out that there are more effective and less effective ways for the federal government to spend money, if spurring job creation and creating economic opportunity is a goal.  The Green Recovery report shows how $100 billion of smartly invested and leveraged federal dollars can create two million new jobs, in the next two years. The time has come to shift our priorities in a new direction.

The second myth is that public spending on expensive green energy is just going to drive up energy prices for working people and poor people. Therefore, disadvantaged people would be better off languishing in the present, pollution-based “gray economy” – rather than supporting a shift to a greener and cleaner economy.


Again, this is not true. A significant amount of the investment in the economic recovery bill likely will be in energy efficiency – such as in the Weatherization Assistance Program and the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant.  These investments actually reduce energy costs and they create thousands of community jobs.


A recent study by Professor David Roland-Holst at the University of California at Berkley shows that the systematic multi-decade effort to promote “innovative energy efficiency policies in California created 1.5 million additional full-time jobs with a total payroll of over $45 billion. Furthermore, investments in renewable energy will help create economies of scale, which will drive down the price of these technologies – and they will level the playing field with the subsidized fossil fuel industry. In the long run, smart policy and investment will drive down prices for clean, renewable, homegrown energy sources. But if we cling to the old, carbon-intensive energy technologies, then the price we all pay – in volatile economic costs, in climate disruption and in threats to our national security – will continue to climb. And the poor will be hit – first and worst – by every one of those rising costs. A well thought out shift to a clean energy economy offers more work, more wealth and better health to disadvantaged communities than does any plausible, business-as-usual scenario.

The last myth seems to afflict green job boosters, more so than green job detractors. That final myth is the notion that “talking” about green jobs somehow magically creates them. While maintaining our enthusiasm and evangelism for a new economic direction, the time has come for all of us to move even more aggressively from inspiration to implementation.

It pains me to point out that politicians and advocates (like myself) made countless speeches referencing green jobs last year. But in the end, Congress failed to appropriate the funds necessary for the one piece of federal legislation that would have made money available for green job training across the country: the Green Jobs Act of 2007, Title X of the Energy Independence and Security Act. We must do better.

When it comes to rhetoric about green jobs, we are experiencing a bubble. But when it comes to advancing meaningful, federal legislation for green jobs, we are still in a bowl. As someone who gives a lot of speeches, myself, let me say: messages and inspiration are important. But the American people cannot eat political sound-bites. They cannot take shelter under slogans.

People need real job training, real service opportunities and real jobs – right now, desperately. As you consider the upcoming economic recovery package, I urge you and your colleagues to seek full funding – and more – for the Green Jobs Act.

Furthermore, I urge you to go beyond that basic program to create something bolder. Now is the time for the United States to create a Clean Energy Corps to retrofit millions of buildings – while giving community service opportunities, job training and employment to hundreds of thousands of people. (Green For All and our allies are developing a proposal for just such an initiative, which we will submit next month for the committee’s review.)

These are the kinds of concrete, practical actions that would represent important steps forward in making America’s green dreams come true.

Our national leaders this year can move on from changing the rhetoric to changing the lived reality for millions of Americans. That will be the great work for the new Administration, for the 111th Congress – and for all of us.

In a time of economic peril, let us never forget that everything that is required to make America’s economy cleaner, greener and more resilient is a career pathway for someone. Or a business contract. Or an entrepreneurial opportunity. We can power America through this recession by repowering America with clean energy. We can create millions of jobs that will make our people wealthier and the Earth healthier. Let us begin.


In closing, let me thank you for your courage and your fortitude in these difficult times … When a fire breaks out, there are only two kinds of people: the majority who wisely rush out – and the few who bravely rush in. For those who have prepared themselves to be in the latter category, we have a word: that word is “heroes.”

Our country is facing multiple disasters and crises. Now is the time for heroines and heroes. Wiser people – seeing these difficulties on the horizon – might have chosen this moment to rush out of public service and to run away from the tough and controversial committees.

But you are braver people. And you have chosen to rush in – just when your country needs you the most. I thank you for that. We all do.

The next Congress can be a Congress of heroines and heroes. If you resolve to turn this economic breakdown into a genuine breakthrough for our planet and our people, it certainly will be.

I thank you for your time and attention.

Download a PDF of this testimony
Document Actions

Great!

Posted by Christian at Jan 15, 2009 02:29 PM
Excellent testimony. Very well-built and explanatory arguments. Great read. Thanks :-)

Green Jobs to Protect Lands and Wildlife

Posted by Nora Jones at Jan 15, 2009 03:06 PM
Great speech - very articulate and convincing. I applaud your efforts in this important endeavor.

great speech

Posted by Deidre at Jan 15, 2009 03:15 PM
Great job, Van. I think that another component of green jobs is also undoing some of the damage we've done in the past. You've probably already seen Earthworks mine clean-up initiative (http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/[…]/?action_KEY=450), I think this and similar actions to help mitigate the destruction done in key areas is also worthwhile.

Keep fighting the good fight!

awesome assessment

Posted by David Scott at Jan 15, 2009 03:17 PM
These green myths are damaging because people give up when others stand around saying it won't work.

If you want to see how it will work, then spend 5 hours researching hybrid cars -- what an exciting movement. If you want to see how it will work, then research newer, better batteries. If you want to see how it will work then consider corridors of energy (T. Boone Pickens Plan). If you want to see how it could incredibly work then view the Solar Roadways proposal which could be our first national grid. And don't forget the incredible inventors in America who pioneered air cars, steam cars. hydrogen cars, electric cars, and who are leading a revolution in spite of government.

Solar Roadways

Posted by Julie Brusaw at Feb 06, 2009 11:25 PM
Thanks David, for your encouragement about my husband's Solar Roadways project. As you say, it meets the criteria to become the intelligent, decentralized (secure), self-healing power grid that could replace our aging infrastructure. As with all of the other pioneers you mentioned, we have to overcome myths and gain public acceptance. If anyone is interested in reading more, you can go to www.solarroadways.com. We welcome all comments and questions.

We would welcome contact from you David and from Van Jones as well as any other interested parties.

A call for responsibility

Posted by Luis Santos at Jan 15, 2009 03:33 PM
Simpler words could not better convey the obvious truth, bold and decisive action is needed right now, this very moment.

Van Jones rocks, Our President on deck needs for all of us to remain forward thinking and insistent on progressive domestic policy around energy sustainability and for an eductaion system that is on par with being one of the riches of the industrialized nations in terms of currency.

Congress testimonial

Posted by Jill Ferguson at Jan 15, 2009 04:23 PM
What else is there to say but,

          YOU ROCK VAN!

Words well stated!

Posted by James Robinson-Long at Jan 15, 2009 05:07 PM
Thankyou so much, Van Jones, for your courage, your clarity, and your persistence.

God's speed in this important "dance of life" in which we are all intrinsically linked for an eternity.

Peace,
   james

Ethanol

Posted by Jannet Schraer at Jan 15, 2009 05:14 PM
Dear Van and Niki; Wow, how wonderful for you to be on the front line. I admire your work so much. Thanks again. Also, thanks for reminding us that a renewable, home-grown biofuels industry is part of the Energy Legislation. I hope you have had time to glance at David Blume's "Alcohol Can Be a Gas," as it points to a conversion to flex fuel vehicles powered on our energy crops, (corn is the lease desireable, but let's not throw out the baby with the bath water), ethanol, as a path to 25,000,000 new jobs, reversal of global climate change, (energy crops sequester 12x the CO2 from the air), and US energy independance. Also, most people now know that "fuel vs food, ethanol takes too much good crop land, and more energy in than out," are all myths forwarded by the oil companies. www.alcoholcanbeagas.com David's book is the rural equivelent of your urban vision. You two have so much in common. We all owe you a deep debt of gratitude. Yes, YOU ROCK!

Inspirational testimony!

Posted by Pwint Phyu Htun at Jan 15, 2009 05:33 PM

Eloquent and empowering testimony, Van! You are the knight in shining armor for us! Keep up the great work, Green for All team.

I am so grateful to be living in US at this crucial and exciting time in our history.

Giving green jobs a try

Posted by Evette Wagner at Jan 15, 2009 06:46 PM
If we are planning on not breathing in clean air or to stop drinking water and not eating enough healthy safe food then there will no real life on this planet. Everything will continue to die. Changing can't be so bad as we would rather die than try. How many things do we need before we realise that is doesn't last long. We may save the planet and ourselves. Give green jobs and a greener lifestyle a try.

Energy Independence

Posted by sherry at Jan 15, 2009 08:19 PM
We need to utilize everything in out power to reduce our dependence on foreign oil including using our own natural resources.OPEC will continue to cut production until they achieve their desired 80-100. per barrel. The high cost of fuel this past year seriously damaged our economy and society. Oil is finite. We are using oil globally at the rate of 2X faster than new oil is being discovered. We need to take some of these billions in bail out bucks and bail ourselves out of our dependence on foreign oil. Jeff Wilson has a really good new book out called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence Now. He explores our uses of oil besides gasoline, our depletion, out reserves and stores as well as viable options to replace oil.Oil is finite, it will run out in the not too distant future. WE need to take some of these billions in bail out bucks and bail America out of it's dependence on foreign oil. The historic high price of gas this past year did serious damage to our economy and society. WE should never allow others to have that much power over our economy again. I wish every member of congress would read this book too.
www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com



Testimony before the Select Committee on Energy

Posted by Brian Webster at Jan 15, 2009 10:11 PM
Great work Van! We are fortunate to have great Senators and Congresspersons in the SF Bay Area who really support the Green Jobs agenda. Keep us informed on how we can support Green Jobs Now legislative efforts nationally.

Thank you,

Posted by Ida Martinac at Jan 15, 2009 10:26 PM
Van, for speaking out for so many of us. Your testimony was powerful and persuasive, and effectively addressed the absolutely most important problems on our plate at this time in history.

May the Force be with you!


enforcement follow-up

Posted by Larry Pines at Jan 16, 2009 12:29 AM
Great speech Van.

 Now, even if Congress WERE to take-up the banner and enact legislation to comply with these plans - what's to ensure actual physical compliance? The Reagan/Bush & Bush Jr administrations made a lot of promises in fancy speeches and generated a lot of smoke - supposedly promoting 'green' friendly legislation - yet reduced or completely eliminated funding for the very programs they publically promoted.
 
 One such program, the Dept Of Energy 'I&I' (Inventions & Innovations) has a pretty website espousing American inventors' creativity in developing energy solutions and the millions of dollars spent - yet a disclaimer (maintained on that site since at least the year 2000) advises they have no funding to offer anyone to meet the goals espoused on the website!

 So, here's a prime example of 'smoke and mirrors' where legislation and regulation SEEM to demonstrate support for positive action - when, in actual fact, they offer no such support.

 Another example can be found (local to me in NY) where the EPA had cited GE for polluting the Hudson River with PCBs and developed a plan for their removal.

 Public comment sessions were organized so people could hear the details of the EPA plan and/or offer alternatives. IF the EPA were serious in considering any alternatives they would have investigated the alternatives brought before their committees and gotten back to the suggestors.

 Unfortunately, these civil servants are (understandably) more concerned for their careers and pensions than the environment and public health thereby maximising environmental destruction while further degrading public health and welfare.

 In the true spirit of 'Love Canal' they will dredge the river bottom of PCB contaminated silt (spilling much in the process to wash downstream), 'de-water' (squeeze) it to remove most of the water (running off into the river again) and truck the remaining sludge to dump in disused subsurface mine shafts (whereever).

 It seems the college educations of these highly paid EPA 'experts' comes up short concerning actual physical earthworks because it's a well known fact (amongst miners and people living around mines) that rainwater runoff seeping INTO these mines finds its way OUT through natural fissures and ventilation/drainage shafts.

 Ask anyone living near disused mines in the American west - various heavy metals leech out and are carried to natural springs or they run off into streams, creeks and rivers - contaminating drinking water resources - yet the EPA claims this plan will NOT pose such a problem. (maybe they're going to bottle-up all the sludge in plastic drums before lowering it into the mines?)

 I brought them an alternative which would save them some $400 million (by their own estimates), eliminate the problem of PCBs leaking back into the river and render the removed silt usable for agricultural purposes.

 And MY suggestion was based upon research data collected by and published in a catalog of 'approved technologies' BY the EPA! When I presented THAT fact to the EPA staff at my local public comment session the audience broke into laughter.

 The EPA staffers promised to investigate this 'HEEBI' (High Energy Electron Beam Irradiation) technology - though it'd already BEEN investigated and judged effective for use (by the EPA) with sewage, PCBs and other organic chemicals - and 'get back to us' with their findings. Well, they never did 'get back to me' or anyone else I know of for that matter.

 I brought a video tape (of the process in-use at the Miami-Dade Cnty water treatment plant) to a local environmental working group (Riverkeeper) and their officers promised to make it public knowledge at their next rally. however, they never exposed it to the public - but at least they DID return my tape.

 For some reason it seems bureaucrats in both the Govt AND 'NGOs' have an aversion to carrying out the grand plans they promise in their public pronouncements. Could it be 'Mob money' is dissuading them from making good?

Thanks; Larry

Going Green

Posted by Jerry Lee Mayeux at Jan 16, 2009 06:37 AM
Consider the Connection to:
Environment and Economy
Please visit: www.hattiesburgamerican.com screen name CTC123
PROFILE-PHOTOS-BLOG-COMMENTS

green funding

Posted by Evette Wagner at Jan 16, 2009 07:52 AM
I am having difficulty finding start up funding in North Carolina for green education/training projects. North Carolina is a state that has many advantages from geographical to rural and urban factions and resources available from the Research Trainale Park to educational insitutions that would greatly enhance a green collar/green lifestyle learning facility. We can't have a green economy without a trained workforce. I am unemployed with over twenty years environmental experience. I've got the time but not the fudning.

Re: Support for Green Jobs

Posted by Kathleen A. Butler at Jan 16, 2009 11:34 AM
Please pass the funding bill.

GRACIAS! Diversity & Creating Green in our Communities

Posted by Sylvia Trujillo at Jan 16, 2009 11:40 AM
Gracias, Van, for your clear message, leadership, and vision.

I streamed the hearing and was struck by the early comments of a Republican member that we should not pick "winners and losers." As you and others properly noted, we have been doing so. Past policymakers have made shortsighted public policy and funding decisions that benefited a select few in the short run, and harmed everyone--particularly the most vulnerable across the globe and in this country--and the Earth itself over the long haul.

I sent a message to the House Committee staff thanking them for having the hearing and asking them to continue their focus on helping the Earth and all communities.

Gracias por todos that you have done, your organization, and all of the inspired individuals such as Hilda Solis. BRAVO. To have such advocates for the Earth, the country, and our communities, I have renewed hope.

Ironically, it was a family crisis that precipitated me learning about solar energy and then further about other renewable energy and energy efficiency efforts. I am a Harvard/Berkeley educated Chicana, but it was an effort focused on including the most marginalized in our country in a electronic engineering for solar energy job training program and the profoundly positive impact it has had on a member of my family's life that has altered the trajectory of my life and my desire to invest even further in helping my community and help protect the Earth at the same time.

In looking for answers and solutions, I came across this webpage and then I read your book. It has spurred a profound change in my life and what I intend to do with it and what I plan to do for my community. I was only working around the margins and you and others have inspired me to make a complete commitment to this effort. Thank you for including me, my family, my community in this effort.
 

Sweet Words Turn Into Real Action.

Posted by Chris Matthew Eudy at Jan 16, 2009 02:30 PM
Van you are elected as CGO thank you.

Green For All

Posted by Piyali Sen Dasgupta at Jan 16, 2009 10:59 PM
It is a great initiative and wish you Best!We belong to a Great planet which has rain forests and vegetation making us quite unique.We are on right track as long as we remember our Green value.

Meaningfully define deconstruction of "defense" industry.

Posted by P.R. Velasco at Jan 25, 2009 03:34 PM
When the fire is set out by either our troops, or the dear privatized contractors, in a future-pillage projected setting The only possibly heroic scenario, will be recycling those industries through green policies of intervention, for which a substantial amount of effort has to be concentrated, to drive the "preemptive attack" mode to a truly comprehensive defense conversion, in a global role that we have botched so far. Count me on for that journey, where we can moonlight our spare time in education, health, and at the end of the day, still recount a charitable hunger-relief priority in the very same areas we have been investing massive human resources, without clear future employment perspectives.

"Opportunities For Green Growth: Myths & Realities About Green Jobs"

Posted by Tracy Atkin at Jan 16, 2009 11:06 PM
Have you ever heard of the "Boy who cried wolf? All you are doing is retelling lies along with the facts in this testimony. Some of the things you have written make it hard for them to separate the lies from the truth. Your message is too long. Your listeners and readers will get bored. "If we are smart"... This is a put-down. "Buck Rodgers," "George Jetson"... They will pay more attention to those names than the rest of your paper. You need to redo this. Quit with the myths and only give them the truth.

Testimony before the Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming

Posted by ann at Jan 18, 2009 05:41 PM
Great speech....short sweet and to the point....thank-you

Val Jones' testimony before Select Comm, Jan. 19,2009

Posted by Joanna Foster at Jan 27, 2009 05:33 PM
I am currently reading The Green Economy by Val Jones. His above testimony reflects the knowledge and optimism of his book. More jobs for the poor! Good. Less pollution! Great. Less dependence on foreign governments for fuel. Terrific. Greater security. wonderful.Energizing our sluggish economy. terrific. Sounds like a win-win situation for all of us.