A Green Agenda for Obama's First 100 Days
Environmentalists offer the president-elect their advice on the priorities he should set for his administration.
Yale Environment 360 asked a wide-ranging group of
environmental activists, scientists, and thinkers to answer the
following question: If you were advising Barack Obama, what would you
tell him are the most important environmental and energy initiatives
that he should launch during his first 100 days?
Although the respondents — including entrepreneur Paul Hawken, Rajendra
Pachauri of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, activist Van
Jones, and green investing leader Mindy Lubber — represent a broad
range of interests, they were largely in agreement on how best to solve
the current economic and environmental challenges. Basically, they
agree that weaning the country off fossil fuels and onto renewable
sources of energy is the single best way to rebuild the U.S. economy;
that Obama must use all the tools at his disposal — from invoking the
Clean Air Act for regulating greenhouse gas emissions to persuading the
new Congress to put a price on carbon — to tackle climate change and
spur the move to alternative energy; that under an Obama administration
the United States must lead in forging a new global climate change
treaty; and that, given the rapidity of global warming, Obama must be
made fully aware of the “scary” scientific facts — as environmentalist
Bill McKibben puts it — and move with a sense of urgency.
Here are their responses:
Bill McKibben | Rajendra K. Pachauri | Mindy Lubber
Paul Hawken | Joseph Romm | Frances Beinecke
Fred Krupp | David W. Orr | Van Jones | William K. Reilly
Paul R. and Anne H. Ehrlich | Betsy Taylor | Bill Chemeides
Van Jones, founding president of the group, Green for All, and a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.
During the Great Depression, Franklin Roosevelt created the Civilian
Conservation Corps to put people to work tackling the economic and
environmental challenges of his day. The new administration must help
create an economy that is based on building, not borrowing; on
creativity, not credit and consumption. We need to establish a Clean
Energy Corps to help us meet our modern challenges. This corps should
be charged with retrofitting and re-powering America. It would have
three components: The first would be fully funded green community
service programs — for example, getting volunteers to plant trees and
gardens. The second would be green job training programs; trainees
would learn how to install solar panels, weatherize buildings, and do
green construction. And lastly, green jobs; the federal government
should invest heavily in renewable energy and energy retrofits for
buildings. Much of this work would pay for itself in energy savings.
Such an effort would jumpstart the economy.
Bill McKibben, author, scholar in residence at Middlebury College, and founder of 350.org.
It seems to me that job number one with climate change involves Obama
sitting down with his new employees — most importantly the world's
premier climatologist, Jim Hansen at NASA — and making sure he has a
full grounding in the latest climate science. The new president needs
to understand what the cutting edge is telling us: that the targets and
goals of even two or three years ago are insufficient — 350 parts per
million of CO2 in the atmosphere has become the new red line.
If Obama understands that, much else will eventually flow — especially
a much deeper examination of whether coal can continue to be a part of
the way we power this planet. Without a deep and scary sense of the
science, Obama will do lots of good and useful things, but nothing that
adds up to the scale of change that we actually need. So I think the
first hundred days should be less about action and more about
information gathering.
Our one hope is that Obama is as smart as he seems — that he can
assimilate the complex but not especially technical science, reach a
conclusion about who is right, and then set policy. Scientific realism
has to drive political realism in this case, because as the problem is
currently understood in Washington, political realism won't come
anywhere near grappling with it.
...



